Crossfit: permission to succeed requires permission to fail

The other day at CrossFit East Sacramento we had difficult warm up and WOD.   The warm up included the usual stretches, plus 5x 200m runs broken up by various drills (inch worm, high kicks, Sampson, etc.)  I timed my 200m runs just to see my run rate; I went 40, 42, 54, didn’t time one and ended up with a 43 for the final run.  My goal would be to run a sub 7 minute mile, so I’m getting there. Then 10 pullups, 10 push ups and 15 ghd situps.  Next we did 10 50m sled pushes with 90#.  We did one push up to the 50m cone, our partner pushed back while the other person walked back.  Then back again. It was tough.

I was beat up before we even got to the WOD.  Which was 5 pullups, 5 pushups, and 10 air squats max rounds for 8 minutes.  Like a mini-Cindy.  Now this WOD plays to all my strengths (such as they are): upper body.  I would expect to get at least 10, maybe 12 rounds.

I settled for 8.  Which pretty much sums it up.  I just could not get motivated.  The sled pull apparently broke my resolve.  My first round took about 44 seconds.  Little by little I slowed down, and I have to say I just didn’t care enough to go faster.  Towards the end I actually slowed down to avoid another round.

Given the WOD had no safety issues to speak of, and pullups and pushups are something I do regularly and well, I should have gone all out.  What’s the hold up I ask myself?  Well I think I just didn’t want to put up with failing.  Which is another way of saying I lowered the intensity because I was mentally exhausted.

But that would have been the time to break through.  A golden opportunity.  But if you don’t give yourself permission to fail, you’re not giving yourself permission to succeed.

Cheers.


Posted in Crossfit Diaries | Comments Off on Crossfit: permission to succeed requires permission to fail

Crossfit: what would Yoda do?

Yoda once intoned, “judge me by my size do you?”  Well, yes, sort of.

When I first got involved with crossfit, I remarked to a friend of mine that I had to set my expectations correctly, because I am a not a very big guy.  She agreed, and told me it was something I needed to realize. Well I wasn’t sure we meant it the same way.  Ah well.

Interestingly enough, I don’t actually think of myself as small.  I can, after all, hold a tea cup with one hand.  My feet reach the ground when I’m on the toilet.  More importantly, I simply don’t think of myself as small.  Of course the way I scale the WODs tells a somewhat different tale, as I’m usually on the lighter side of the women’s Rx.  And from time-to-time I’m reminded that I will need to “put on more lean muscle” if I want to improve my crossfit game.

I had read that Chris Spealler, an incredible crossfit athelete, has chosen to gain weight so he can compete better.  I can understand that, given his desire to compete professionally.  But I am still not convinced crossfit is a game of big vs. small. I’ve seen huge guys to 110 burpees in 7 minutes, and I’ve seen those same athletes being outperformed at lifting by much smaller athletes.  It happens all the time.

In any case my job is to maximize what I have to work with, and improve it.

For me, crossfit is all about maximizing fitness.  As for my capacity to enjoy life, that’s not correlated with size.  Some things, after all, are about belief.

Cheers.

Posted in Crossfit Diaries | Comments Off on Crossfit: what would Yoda do?

Crossfit: Helen

Crossfit has created a set of standard workouts (“WODS”) named after women.  Helen is one of them.  Helen consists of 3x 400m run, 21 kettlebell swings, and 12 pullups.  I was under the impression that the Rx for the kettlebell was 35lbs, but it turns out to be “1.5 pood” — 55lbs!  So I haven’t been Rx-ing Helen after all. Just one more thing to get mad about I guess.

Anyway back to my main point. On January 2nd I did Helen in 13:48.  It was tough.  The better athletes have sub-10 minute times.  But I told myself give it couple of months and I’ll try again. So I did.  I put everything I had into it.  At the end I could hardly stand up; laying down wasn’t much help either.  I had to wait several minutes before I could drive.

The result?

A total time of 13:25.  All that suffering for a 23 second improvement?  I stopped only once, to tie my shoe.  The kb swings were unbroken, I did the pullups in sets with two breaths between sets.  I ran all out.  I figured I’d be in the 12 minute range for sure.  What happened?

Helen consists of 3x 400m runs, and 97 movements (61 kb swings, 36 pullups.)  Assuming 3 seconds per movement, adjusted to 300 seconds, we get 5 minutes for the movements.  If we figure 2 minutes per run for 6 minutes total run time, we’re up to 11 minutes total.  I can run the 400m in 1:40, so 2 minutes is a fair estimation of the average — so 6 minutes is a good run time.  If that is the case it took me 7:25 to do 97 movements, or 7.47 seconds per movement.  What the heck happened to 3 seconds?  I’m way off that mark.

What this tells me is I need stricter controls. I was working alone, and my timer was a small plastic alarm clock with a second hand.  I set it on the hour when I started to simplify things,  but that’s not enough. I need a stopwatch.  More importantly, I need somebody to note each iteration of 400m, kb swing and pullup.  I need t see where I’m losing time.  I suppose I could break it apart and manage it in pieces by myself, but I think having someone to help me keep pace is going to work better in the long run.  We’ll see.

Cheers.


 

 

 

 

Posted in Crossfit Diaries | Comments Off on Crossfit: Helen

Crossfit: the nature of inspiration

A few days ago one of the guys at CFES revealed he has some severe health problems: Celiac Disease, Hashimoto’s and Auto Immune Hepatitis.  Celiac is an allergy to wheat gluten.  Hashimoto’s is  a thyroid condition and Auto Immune Hepatitis is a liver condition. I had to look online to find this out, because I was not familiar with any of those diseases.  He’s lived with these problems for almost 20 years.

He manages to control the symptoms by adhering to a strict diet, and Crossfit.  My own experiences with controlling diet lead me to believe it’s a difficult thing to do.  Not to mention crossfit, which has it’s own requirements for discipline. He described the situation on the CFES blog, and I noticed a lot of people (myself included) used the word “inspiring” to describe his story.

It occurred to me afterwards that I did not recall ever actually being inspired by anybody.  Now that’s a very surprising thing to discover.  I recall being envious, or ambitious enough to want success, or curious about how other people got on, but never inspired.  At least not as an adult.  As a child I remember thinking various famous people were really interesting and had marvelous adventures.  I remember wanting to be an astronaut.  I had some notion that it was heroic.  I’m certain that I had no idea at that time what a hero was.  These days I think a hero is somehow who meets life’s challenges without rancor or bitterness.

I once attended a seminar called “Dynamic Leadership” run by two incredibly strong and compassionate men.  Among other things they had been hostage negotiators, and law enforcement professionals.  At one point one of them told a story that really impressed me, the lesson of which was “just say thanks.”  That is perhaps among the best pieces of advice I ever got.

I suppose I am inspired to take better care of myself, and be respectful of people, when I see how hard other people work at living.  As I’ve gotten past my first 1/2 century of life,  I do notice the desire to invest a bit more of myself in my own life.  Perhaps one day I will find myself interesting!

Today is Sunday.  I did Helen (400m run, 21 35# kettlebells swings, 12 pullups, 3 rounds.) My total time was 13:25.  It is an improvement of 23 seconds since the last time.

Cheers.

 

Posted in Crossfit Diaries | Comments Off on Crossfit: the nature of inspiration

Resurrection Theater: “Talking With” notes and comments

I saw Resurrection Theater’s “Talking With last night at The Artisan Theater.   The play is 11 monologues delivered by 11 different women.  The cast was Margaret Morneau, Gay Cooper, Lindsay Jones, Eliza Webb, Ruby Sketchley, Laura Kaya, Susan Madden, Amy Williams, Shaleen Schmutzer-Smith, Rachel Lanyi and Tara Henry.  The play was directed by Shawn B. O’Neal.

The play consisted of the actors, a few chairs, a basket, several very interesting lamps, marbles, cowboy boots.  The stage was black.

What we have in “Talking With” is a study in existentialist drama.  Which is not to say absurdity, or angst.  It’s more like “existentialist quirk”.  Because the characters are caught in the middle of their story, and alone, they become eccentric.  Well they actually are eccentric to start with, but more so because they are completely out of context.

Some of characters had a distinctly mystical attitudes — the snake handler who discovers emptiness, the baton twirler who communes with god through baton-flagellation,  the woman who sees lamp light as a metaphor for life-energy.  Some were more-or-less common: a bag lady, a pregnant woman in labor, a rodeo worker.  One was grieving for a lost mother and expressed that grief with marbles, one was grieving over loneliness and stage fright, another was a over-sexed neurotic at an audition.  There was a frightened woman who made a patch-work costume to hide behind, and a women who experienced enlightenment through scars and tattoos.

What they all had in common was drama.  The pacing was even, the characters completely at ease.  The monologues were delivered in-the-moment.  As the characters were suspended it time, so was the audience.  This particular kind of suspension of disbelief encourages a subtle out-of-the-body experience.

A cast of 11, each one standing alone on the stage, limited props, no cues, no breaks.  It’s what I would called naked theater.  The show runs until April 22nd.

Cheers.

Posted in Plays | Comments Off on Resurrection Theater: “Talking With” notes and comments

Crossfit: conversations with better athletes

This week the CFES foundations class had 2 WODs that involve running, and I happened to be at both of them.  The one from the other day involved 2 rounds of 200m-400m-600m runs, then a 6 round tabata of  burpees, pullups, dumbbell clean and jerk, knees to bars.

One of the athletes working out that day was from the Level 1 classes.  I worked out along side her.  It was interesting to note that she was working quite a bit harder.  I outweigh her by 40 pounds, but she outran me, did more burpees, pullups, knees to bars and used heavier dumbells (15# vs. 25#.)

I had scaled the dumbells so I could get more reps, but I didn’t get more then she did.  But none of that really bothered me.  What I noticed was that she was got more out of herself.  She was really working.

I mentioned intensity to her, and she told me that it was often the case that she was near exhaustion and nausea during the WODs. She was rather surprised that I didn’t have that same feeling.

And there I am thinking, why can’t I get there.  I’m getting about 75% of a workout, she gets 99%.  Now during that workout my shoulder gave out during burpees, but that is no excuse.  That particular problem only bothers me when I do burpees.

Well the next WOD I was at we did 10x 200 sprints, and double-unders in the remaining time.  My sprints were good; I could feel myself willing to move faster.  And somehow that is the secret: to be willing to move faster. 

But the biggest thing: don’t scale and sacrifice intensity.  Scale to increase the opportunity for intensity.  Run faster.  And next time position the jump-rope closer to the finish line.

Cheers.

Posted in Crossfit Diaries | Comments Off on Crossfit: conversations with better athletes

Mad Men: notes and comments

Mad Men season 5 premiered last month.  I don’t have super-duper cable so I don’t get AMC.  I watched all 4 previous seasons via NetFlix.  I’m always a bit behind on popular culture because I don’t want to pay the full rate and freight for cable.  My wife and I just recently discovered Anthony Bourdain’s “No Reservations.” We were among the last people to watch “Curb Your Enthusiasm”.  But we’re OK with that.

I find Mad Men incredibly interesting.  Marvelous production value, great acting, intriguing story lines.  Typically I’m not a big fan of period pieces, because they are either overdone, underdone, badly acted, or out of context.  I admit that at first I found Mad Men to be a bit of a farce, but that’s really the problem, isn’t it? Mad Men might seem funny now, but hindsight is a deceptive trickster.

The most striking thing to me about the Don Draper character is how much like James Bond he is. They are both promiscuous drunks, they are profoundly destructive, they play by their own rules, and they are, in my estimation, profoundly lonely. Perhaps “singular” is a better word. I suppose “loneliness” only matters if you care.

The best Bond book was “The Spy Who Loved Me” because it methodically and precisely revealed the true nature of James Bond: he was a cold-blooded killer. Ian Fleming’s best work, for my money. All the Bond novels are silly and vapid, but that one was a minor masterpiece. Draper, like Bond, has much more in common with soldiers then civilians. They exist in a “do or die world”, with not much room for compassion in between. The carefully constructed 2000 year-old salon sensibilities of Western Civilization are lost on them; they are quite Roman in their outlook.

Don Draper is a much, much more sophisticated a fictional character then Bond, which is a good thing from an entertainment perspective. There is nothing vapid or silly about Draper. His gargantuan flaws are revealed to be the result of tremendous psychological shock. And from time-to-time he shows an incredible depth of compassion — visiting Peggy in the mental ward, allowing his angry child-wife to walk away with the children, the way he took extreme care to respect and support the woman whose husband’s identity he stole. I think Draper is the most interesting fictional character alive today.

The supporting cast has an incredible depth of talent. These actors create a dynamic rhythm; they establish themselves firmly.  It must be a huge amount of work.  I’m envious of them.

I admit Mad Men has a rather noir silliness — could people really be that callous? One wonders if it’s not the same thing one would have found right before Pompeii was destroyed.  But the destruction in Mad Men is more psychological then physical.  Of course there is a much starker version of this same theme — see Revolution Road.

But I remember the sixties well enough.  One day my mother and I were coming back from a trip, and got into a taxi to get home.  The taxi driver was chatty.  He told us a bit about his life.  He had a good job once, made lots of money, but drank too much and lost his career.  That and his family.  I remember the cab smelled like cigarettes. He had been an advertising executive; a life of booze and women as he described it.  My mother didn’t say a word the whole time we were in the cab. It took me a long time to understand why.  In fact it I didn’t quite get it until I had watched a few episodes of Mad Men.

So which is it — art imitates life or life imitates art?  Beats me.

Cheers.

Posted in Plays | Comments Off on Mad Men: notes and comments

Crossfit: more fear and loathing (well, jealously anyway)

So today we had 10 1 minute 200m sprints with max double-unders for the remaining time.  It takes me about 45  seconds to run 200m, so I had precious little time to get to the rope.  My best effort was 3, and I had a few zeros.  My total was 14.  When I got to the board, I noticed someone had 81.  I thought oh good grief where do these people come from!  Get outta here!  The humiliation never stops.

But I figured that if I did 8 double-unders per round I’d have 81 too.  I’m not that good at double-unders (Chris Spealler of CrossFit Park City demonstrates in the video). So if I improve my running time to 35 seconds, get set up properly, I might be able to do 80. Of course I’d have to get better at double-unders too.

Anyway it was a good set of sprints.

Posted in Crossfit Diaries | Comments Off on Crossfit: more fear and loathing (well, jealously anyway)

Belen Fernandez: Coffee with Hezbollah; comments and notes

The Middle-East is a strange place.  That’s the conclusion I came to after reading Belen Fernandez’s recent book “Coffee with Hezbollah.”  If I had to sum up the book in a few words, I’d say it’s a combination of “Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas” and “Alice In Wonderland.”

Coffee with Hezbollah doesn’t have the sinister quality or psychological violence of Thompson’s work, but it has the whimsy and the 100% subjective viewpoint.  And Fernandez’s description of Lebanon does seem like a fall into a fantasy world.  The characters have a fantastical quality, the whole premise of the situation seems unreal. Two young women hitchhiking in a country beset by war seems unlikely to have occurred at all, much less with a happy outcome.  They are completely free to roam about, and they are treated to hospitality, favors, and friendship.

But it is real.  I suspect (but am not prepared to prove) that in the US has a bi-polar view of the Middle-East — “Lawrence of Arabia” on one hand and “Syriana” on the other.  A world of romance and violence, and some oil.  Belen Fernandez portrays a very, very different Middle-East.  It is far more complex.

Her Middle-East is a combination of common people doing common things in a most uncommon reality.  There is romance, but it is the romance of unexpected courtesies and friendships while traveling.

There is violence; in fact it is pervasive.  It hangs in the air, but never visited on anyone in particular.  The people are sublime, ridiculous, generous, self-serving, thoroughly steeped in misinformation, cynical, skeptical, cunning, and brave.  They are possessed of a kind of wisdom that comes from suffering.

The book is loosely organized around the chronology of the trip.  From Turkey to Syria to Lebanon and many points in between and back and forth.  It’s hard to keep track of the locale or the characters.  There is probably a metaphor in there somehow.  Perhaps the fluid quality of the characters and settings presents the Middle-East as it really is, which is to say dynamic, not homogeneous, complex, and very fluid.  If it is unstable, it is that way for a reason.  Those reasons should be respected.

The one thing that stands out in this book is the one thing that I think is totally lost in other  discussions about the Middle-East: the humanity of the people.  Fernandez captures the attitudes and personalities of the people she meets with a fine touch.  She is satirical, but in a way that reminds me that everyone is to some extent a caricature when viewed from the lens of another culture.  To the people she met Fernandez must have seemed quite magical.

Coffee with Hezbollah is very different from Fernandez’s other book, “The Imperial Messenger: Thomas Friedman at Work,which I reviewed earlier.  That book was austere in it’s format and unrelenting in it’s attack on the polices of the US and it’s allies.  Coffee with Hezbollah is more poetic.  The political artifacts are certainly there, but presented as factual ironies on the ground.  Which is to say unavoidable realities that are accepted, if not acceptable.

The people Fernandez encounters may have a different worldview then me or you, but they have hopes, dreams, and they aspire to success in worldly and spiritual matters.   Something to remember when we read our daily news.

Cheers.


Posted in Reviews | Comments Off on Belen Fernandez: Coffee with Hezbollah; comments and notes

Crossfit: mental discipline revisited

For me crossfit tends to be something of an obsession.  Lots of people can make that same claim, so I’m not unique.  But (for better or worse) I also tend to see patterns and connections to things that at first glance seem far removed from each other.

The other day I read “The Book That Drove Them Crazy“, a review of a book called “The Closing of the American Mind: How Higher Education Has Failed Democracy and Impoverished the Souls of Today’s Students.”  I have not read Bloom’s book, but I have read Robert Bork’s “Slouching Towards Gomorrah” and I suspect it’s the same kind of message. At the time I read Bork’s book, I didn’t find much to agree with.

Crossfit requires a huge amount of mental discipline.  The whole concept of crossfit is based on intensity; it’s painful, so it takes a bit of work just to give oneself permission to endure it.  For me there is also quite a bit of emotional energy, various attachments to ego, self-worth, self-perception.

Opening oneself up to the kind of self-analysis that promotes success in the physical arts is the same thing required for success in the “intellectual arts.”  One of the most important classes I had in college (one of two, to be honest) was Drama 101: Theater Appreciation.  I had never actually seen a play, much less done any acting.  Getting up in front of people and reciting Thomas More’s final monologue in “A Man for All Seasons” was frightening.  Crossfit has that same impact on me, and that very same appeal that I get from writing plays.

Developing the intellect requires the disciplines of self-awareness and self-analysis.  Just like crossfit.  What I’m finding is that the harder I work at crossfit, the more patience and perseverance I have in other parts of my life.

I really do need to re-read Robert Bork.

Cheers.

Posted in Crossfit Diaries | Comments Off on Crossfit: mental discipline revisited